Where Trump And Stephen Miller Have A Point

Dear ladies and fellas

First things first: Please excuse my pathetic English. English is not my first language and I did not proof-read this post by friends of mine, whose English is far more supreme than mine, but I have to speak up on this issue. A couple of minutes ago I watched another episode of „Morning Joe“ where Stephen Miller defended the decision to only allow people to apply for the „Green Card“, who have some English skills. Obviously I am not American and do not live in any English-speaking country like Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, GB, Canada, Jamaica and Ghana, so that explains my far from perfect English, but still I am able to speak and write in this very language and that shows, that if somebody is willing to learn English one is more than capable to do so, even when in a non English speaking country.

Personally, as somebody who lived as a child in different countries, like Switzerland, Georgia (The country in the Caucasian mountains, not the state…), Russia and Kazakhstan, I see the importance to being able to communicate with the people around you and being to do simple stuff, like buying groceries, looking for a job and going to a doctor when necessary on your own. So for me to ask people to learn English, who have planes to migrate to the United States is in my book not much to ask for. Personally I wouldn`t have voted for Trump, instead I would have voted for Lewinsky, because she gets the „Job“ obviously done, when others fail. Also, I do not speak about actually refugees in my post, but of people who make plans to migrate to a certain place and for this people, again, I do not think, it is too much to ask for, that they should learn English beforehand.

I am not here for braindead excuses for terrorists

Dear ladies and fellas

Last week another Arab stabbed random civilians, killing one of those civilians. This time it happend in the German city of Hamburg and the murderer was asylum seeker, whose application for asylum in Germany was rejected and he was about to getting deported. However before he could get deported he commited this horrendous crime. Now all kind of apologists creep out of their holes and try to excuse and defend the crime commited by the Arab stabber. The most common  braindead“excuse“, that I heard so far in the real world and online, was that the Arab was „desperate“, because his application got rejected and he was about to getting deported and therefore could not become a dentist in Germany.

I am not down for such braindead excuses, mainly because terrorists do not commit their horrendous crimes out of despair, but because they are radicalized, mostly because they are fed from an early age with an insane amount of propaganda. People do not commit crimes or engage in terrorism only because they are desperate. That`s not how it works. There are many people in the world, who are desperate for several very good reasons. I know that from my own experience and because I grew up in Georgia, a country in which many people had for years many valid reasons to be desperate, sad and angry. Among those reasons are for example the fact, that Georgia had to endure two wars in the last twentyfive years, one civil war in the nineties and later one war against Russia. Still, one does not see Georgians commit any terror-attacks on innocent civilians out of despair.

We also don`t see Romani- and Sinti- people commit horrendous terrorattacks on civilians, given the fact that Romani and Sinti people are the most oppresed ethnic groups in Europe. Neither we see acts of terrorism commited by Jews on European soil, despite the growing antisemitsm in Europe and therefore the increased danger for Jews in Europe.

I think it is highly offensive to people, who actually suffered to excuse terrorism with „despair“ and „poverty“. Also it doesn`t fix the problem of terrorism itself, which is commited by radicalized thugs. Not desperate people.